Very frankly, at this stage, at the expense of sounding like an idiot, I have to say the information I have been getting is much too contradictory to form a complete opinion. No offense meant to anyone having posted part of this information, it is not their fault if someone else posted something different anc contradictory.
For now, I will say this. Based on Brian Smith\'s shots, I have high hopes for the A7R and Zeiss FE 35.
Anything wider than that looks iffy, but the hierarchy of lenses that work -or not- on the NEX 7 seems up to now fairly consistent. So I pretty much gave up hope for my G 28, but not my Elmar 24, and I started looking for a Summicron 28 M, which would in any case be a FL I use more. My \'Lux 50 should be all right per Huff, but others say otherwise. And I just ordered a \'Cron 75 APO. For really wide stuff, I am keeping my NEX 7 and Touit 12 uni Zeiss come up with their own A7-optimized solution, which I have zero doubt they will; Until then I will also check on the 24-70 f:4.0, in the unlikely possibility that its is good enough to wean me off my prime-only snobbery.
Nov 02, 2013 at 04:47 PM
Previous versions of philber's message #11906518 « A7/A7r - performance with WA RF lenses »
