Damn, I thought had you some real samples for sec there.
Having seen many shots which appeared ok on my LCD and turned out to be not so great, I\'m afraid it\'s still speculation. If anything works it would be the WATE---I think it was also OK on the Nex-7.
I just have little use for such bargin basement lenses
It would be an option, though an expensive one.
Rich
Anyone for whom that is an option is unlikely to be wasting their time here. Instead they are out and about with an M9 on one shoulder, a 240 on the other, a nice M8 in the trunk, and a 110 LB sherpa girl in case things get to heavy.
Or at least I would be.
not me. shooting ultra wides seems like such a pain with a rangefinder (plus i don\'t like rangefinders). do you have to carry 3 separate viewfinders when you shoot with that lens or is there a tri-elmar viewfinder too?
There is a special \"Frankenfinder\" for the Tri-Elmar than can be purchased separately or with the lens to be used with the M9 and previous M series cameras. It costs about $900 for the finder, but it is not necessary for the M240 (if using the EVF or the LCD screen) or the Sony A7 or A7r.
By the way the Tri-Elmar is actually a zoom and you can zoom between the focal lengths and you do not have to set the lens to 16mm, 18mm, or 21mm.
Rich
Nov 01, 2013 at 02:44 PM
Previous versions of naturephoto1's message #11904410 « A7/A7r - performance with WA RF lenses »
