Pixel Perfect wrote: galenapass wrote:
All shot on a blah overcast day. But, you are correct they are not that impressive.
I did not see, were those SOC?
Lot of people are going to be disappointed when they see their results. They think a 36MP sensor sans AA filter will magically give them tack sharp results, yet fail to realise how such a camera will demand better technique, good glass and often a tripod to truly realise the potential. This thing will be brutal for showing up even the slightest motion blur. For landscape hands down you\'ll want a tripod, no more being lazy. Hand held you\'ll want faster shutter speeds or stick to IS lenses. I guess if you are going to be down sampling that\'ll help, but then you might as well get the A7.
Of the several full sized shots I looked at, none were tack sharp (yes I do realise these are huge images), and wouldn\'t be any better than say a D600/6D/5DIII if resized, for per pixel sharpness. I think for this type of happy snap walkabout in general you won\'t get full value of the 36MP. Of course their be plenty of exceptions and some people have steadier hands and some will have IS lenses, but a lot of people are just going to jump on the bandwagon thinking it\'ll make them better photographers.
No big deal...you treat all cams the same way you normally shoot. How do you think 18MP cropper sensor (~46MP FF) being handled... all on tripod
If not the SENSOR then who cares about A7(r), we all shoot all canon cams by now
