fredmiranda.com
Forum
Presentation Boards
Nature & Wildlife
Landscape Photography
City, Street & Architecture
People Photography
Black & White Photography
Macro & Still Life
Sports Photography
Wedding Photography
Digital Art, Smartphone & Abstract
Trip Location Advice & Meet-ups
Gear Talk
Canon Forum
Nikon Forum
Sony Forum
Leica & Alternative Gear
Fuji Forum
Film Is Not Dead
Micro Four Thirds Forum
Latest Photography News
General Gear-talk
Pro Digital Corner
Lighting & Studio Techniques
Post-processing & Printing
Forum & Miscellaneous
Assignments
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Photo Critique
Buy & Sell
Photo Gear
Tech Tools
Tips for Safe Transactions
Guidelines & Rules
Join Today
What's New
Latest Posts
FM Gear Reviews
Assignment Winners
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Category Winners
Landscape Photography
Nature & Wildlife
People Photography
Register
Login
Forum
Buy & Sell
What's New
Register
Login
fredmiranda.com
Login
Previous versions of
RustyBug
's message
#11878003
« A7/A7r - performance with WA RF lenses »
RustyBug
Offline
Upload & Sell
:
On
Re: A7/A7r - performance with WA RF lenses
philip_pj wrote
:
Distortion - there is no dispute, the RF lenses are better, though the 21/3.4 SEM has 1.5%, the Distagons\' 2.4%.
What is the distortion of the TS-E\'s ?
IIRC, the distortion for the 17L is around 1.1% according to photozone and less than 1% for the 24L TS-E II, with some reporting it around .1%
Oct 21, 2013 at 09:07 AM
RustyBug
Offline
Upload & Sell
:
On
Re: A7/A7r - performance with WA RF lenses
philip_pj wrote
:
Distortion - there is no dispute, the RF lenses are better, though the 21/3.4 SEM has 1.5%, the Distagons\' 2.4%.
What is the distortion of the TS-E\'s ?
Oct 21, 2013 at 08:42 AM
Previous versions of
RustyBug
's message
#11878003
« A7/A7r - performance with WA RF lenses »