The only reason for me to go A7r over the A7 is it handles RF WAs better. 24MP is enough demanding for a good lens. I see people claim that 36 w/o AA is soo much better at landscape, more details will traverse down even to websize. I have yet to see that but as an unlikely early adopter for these cams I ill probably have ample time to see what some of you knowledgeable guys come up with.
We also have to get used to the fact that you now put APS-C pixel-density demands on the peripheral parts of these FF lenses that was never used by all of us adopting these lenses for APS-C. Any of the fine lenses I have, e.g. ZE21, does keep up in corners compared to its best part. This cant be a surprise by anyone really.
philip_pj wrote:
And how many people are really used to looking as intently as they now are, at the extreme corners of their Leica M output?
Good point. BTW, the CV 15 look equally good stopped down F/8-11 as the example I posted on page 20. If people think these (ZM and CV15 stopped down) are examples of smearing they never saw what the Contax G21 can do on the NEX 5N. It\'s a totally different ball game. Still it\'s an able lens that with some targeted PP could be used. Here\'s a ice shot that has smearing + color cast/magenta la-di-da-da. They can turn out good anyway.
NEX5N - Contax G21/2.8
Oct 20, 2013 at 04:48 PM
Previous versions of wfrank's message #11876743 « A7/A7r - performance with WA RF lenses »
