A7r with Contax G 21/2.8. Looks like no major improvement over the NEX 5N, but a little better with regards to corner smearing. That comparison is a bit unfair as the A7r uses a larger part of the image circle than an APS-C sensor.
Not that it is very interesting but if you crop out a APS-C coverage out of the FF image it looks like it could be significantly better than the 5N.
[B]EDIT: Google translation error - bad images. not taken with A7r[/B]
A7r with Contax G 21/2.8. Looks like no major improvement over the NEX 5N, but a little better with regards to corner smearing. That comparison is a bit unfair as the A7r uses a larger part of the image circle than an APS-C sensor.
Not that it is very interesting but if you crop out a APS-C coverage out of the FF image it looks like it could be significantly better than the 5N.
A7r with Contax G 21/2.8. Looks like no major improvement over the NEX 5N, perhaps a tad better with regards to corner smearing. That comparison is a bit unfair as the A7r uses a larger part of the image circle than an APS-C sensor.
Not that it is very interesting but if you crop out a APS-C coverage out of the FF image it looks like it could be significantly better than the 5N.
(A7r+Contax G 21/2.8)
Oct 19, 2013 at 05:33 AM
Previous versions of wfrank's message #11873747 « A7/A7r - performance with WA RF lenses »