Jman13 wrote:
For this test, it doesn\'t conclusively prove much of anything....this test doesn\'t really stress the limits of these cameras, but it is interesting to see that for a typical shot, people can\'t generally tell what format of camera took a picture. This is especially true in my experience when you are just looking at any random image...the image quality of modern cameras is really good at most levels...it\'s only at the extremes where quality differences really start to stand out. Of course, there are other benefits to larger formats...shallower depth of field, availability of specialty lenses like tilt/shift, etc....
Really interesting test. The picture I thought was FF was actually m43. :blush
Jman13 wrote:
For this test, it doesn\'t conclusively prove much of anything....this test doesn\'t really stress the limits of these cameras, but it is interesting to see that for a typical shot, people can\'t generally tell what format of camera took a picture. This is especially true in my experience when you are just looking at any random image...the image quality of modern cameras is really good at most levels...it\'s only at the extremes where quality differences really start to stand out. Of course, there are other benefits to larger formats...shallower depth of field, availability of specialty lenses like tilt/shift, etc....
Really interesting test. The picture I thought was FF was actually m43.
WO look of the bigger formats would be apparant under the same conditions.
Sep 12, 2013 at 09:47 PM
Previous versions of SKumar25's message #11803594 « Spot the Format! »
