Gunzorro wrote:
I agree that it doesn\'t really show anything that a casual observer could distinguish one photo from the other.
Yup, that\'s us ... a bunch of \"casual observers\".
One other interesting stat tidbit comes to mind for me:
50% of us \"casual observers\" (35% + 15%) managed to get NONE of them right (of which I was one). Given there were only 2 out of the 6 choices that could yield them ALL wrong, that would only be a 33% @ random. We were at 1.5X of that.
Do we play again with an HDR outdoor infinity scene?
Gunzorro wrote:
I agree that it doesn\'t really show anything that a casual observer could distinguish one photo from the other.
Yup, that\'s us ... a bunch of \"casual observers\".
One other interesting stat tidbit comes to mind for me:
51% of us \"casual observers\" (34% + 17%) managed to get NONE of them right (of which I was one). Given there were only 2 out of the 6 choices that could yield them ALL wrong, that would only be a 33% @ random. We were at 1.5X of that.
Do we play again with an HDR outdoor infinity scene?
Gunzorro wrote:
I agree that it doesn\'t really show anything that a casual observer could distinguish one photo from the other.
Yup, that\'s us ... a bunch of \"casual observers\".
One other interesting stat tidbit comes to mind for me:
51% of us \"casual observers\" (34% + 17%) managed to get NONE of them right (of which I was one). Given there were only 2 out of the 6 choices that could yield them ALL wrong, that would only be a 33% @ random. We were at 1.5X of that.
Gunzorro wrote:
I agree that it doesn\'t really show anything that a casual observer could distinguish one photo from the other.
Yup, that\'s us ... a bunch of \"casual observers\".
One other interesting stat tidbit comes to mind for me:
51% of us \"casual observers\" (34% + 17%) managed to get NONE of them right (of which I was one).
Sep 12, 2013 at 02:35 PM
Previous versions of RustyBug's message #11802732 « Spot the Format! »
