Jman13 wrote: SKumar25 wrote: Krosavcheg wrote:
I would guess as u43/Aps-C/FF....
+1.
Basing my guess on the perspectives.
The 1st has the most telephoto compression to my eye, next is #2, and last #3. #2 and #3 are quite close.
But telephoto compression is based ENTIRELY on camera to subject distance and has nothing to do with sensor size.
The compression also has to do with FL, one can get same FOV as a wider lens by using a longer lens and stepping back, but then the perspective changes. #1 looks a bit compressed to me.
Jman13 wrote: SKumar25 wrote: Krosavcheg wrote:
I would guess as u43/Aps-C/FF....
+1.
Basing my guess on the perspectives.
The 1st has the most telephoto compression to my eye, next is #2, and last #3. #2 and #3 are quite close.
But telephoto compression is based ENTIRELY on camera to subject distance and has nothing to do with sensor size.
The compression also has to do with FL, one can get same FOV as a wider lens by using a longer lens and stepping back, but then the perspective changes. #1 looks a bit compressed to me.
Jman13 wrote: SKumar25 wrote: Krosavcheg wrote:
I would guess as u43/Aps-C/FF....
+1.
Basing my guess on the perspectives.
The 1st has the most telephoto compression to my eye, next is #2, and last #3. #2 and #3 are quite close.
But telephoto compression is based ENTIRELY on camera to subject distance and has nothing to do with sensor size.
The compression also has to do with FL, one can get same FOV as a wider lens by using a longer lens and stepping back, but then the perspective changes. #1 looks a bit compressed to me.
Lame example:
Sep 12, 2013 at 06:42 AM
Previous versions of SKumar25's message #11801927 « Spot the Format! »
