Lars Johnsson wrote: redisburning wrote:
do you honestly think that the smiley faces hide the fact that youre being both smug AND dense?
it\'s much more likely that CV doesnt make the 125 because people might buy it over the 100MP. which you either know, or you\'re really as dense as your posts imply.
the SLII line is a 40mm pancake, a weak/slow but relatively small 20 & 28 and a slightly updated Topcor 58/1.4. that is precisely zero overlap with the current Zeiss line they also make.
and please, it\'s easy to separate the feelings of wanting to buy a lens for something resembling it\'s value and that of accepting what the market will take. it goes the other way too, how do you think people felt this summer selling their Zeiss lenses for 2 or 300 less than a year ago?
and congrats on your shop having 4 @ 2k. 1. I dont live in Sweden and dont want to deal with intnerational shipping and 2. if it breaks there aren\'t new ones to buy to replace it so now Im looking at 3k again. great fucking solution.
Buy the 90. It\'s a very good lens for a rather low price. Or just do nothing and keep on whining.........
What a nonsense and what a snappy tone in your post again (as usual btw). You are talking about 2 complete different lenses. I own the 90/3.5 SL I and would love to add the 125/2.5, but not at the ridiculous prices that are asked today. Besides that I expect/hope that Zeiss will come with a real 1:1 macro in near future. And that is probably one of the reasons that the 125/2.5 is not in production again. The other reason probably is that Zeiss doesn\'t want to cannabilize the 100/2.
In the little video in this link the Zeiss representative is talking about longer teles and a new macro for Canon and Nikon in near future:
Lars Johnsson wrote: redisburning wrote:
do you honestly think that the smiley faces hide the fact that youre being both smug AND dense?
it\'s much more likely that CV doesnt make the 125 because people might buy it over the 100MP. which you either know, or you\'re really as dense as your posts imply.
the SLII line is a 40mm pancake, a weak/slow but relatively small 20 & 28 and a slightly updated Topcor 58/1.4. that is precisely zero overlap with the current Zeiss line they also make.
and please, it\'s easy to separate the feelings of wanting to buy a lens for something resembling it\'s value and that of accepting what the market will take. it goes the other way too, how do you think people felt this summer selling their Zeiss lenses for 2 or 300 less than a year ago?
and congrats on your shop having 4 @ 2k. 1. I dont live in Sweden and dont want to deal with intnerational shipping and 2. if it breaks there aren\'t new ones to buy to replace it so now Im looking at 3k again. great fucking solution.
Buy the 90. It\'s a very good lens for a rather low price. Or just do nothing and keep on whining.........
What a nonsense and what a snappy tone in your post again (as usual btw). You are talking about 2 complete different lenses. I own the 90/3.5 SL I and would love to add the 125/2.5, but not at the ridiculous prices that are asked today. Besides that I expect/hope that Zeiss will come with a real 1:1 macro in near future. And that is probably one of the reasons that the 125/2.5 is not in production again. The other reason probably is that Zeiss doesn\'t want to cannabilize the 100/2.
In the little video in this link the Zeiss representative is talking about longer teles and a new macro for Canon and Nikon in near future:
