trenchmonkey wrote:
Last looks a tad front focused AND noisy
In my opinion, noise shouldn\'t really be a point of critique, and keep in mind he is manual focusing so not body realated. - I found the D7000 to have too much noise even at ISO 400, not really anything the photog can do about that especially starting at F5.6 - I mean you can use software of course - but you would lose a little of that feather detail.
asiostygius (edit)I recommended the D600 but it was brought to my attention you already have it.
trenchmonkey wrote:
Last looks a tad front focused AND noisy
In my opinion, noise shouldn\'t really be a point of critique, and keep in mind he is manual focusing a 500 - I found the D7000 to have too much noise even at ISO 400, not really anything the photog can do about that especially starting at F5.6 - I mean you can use software of course - but you would lose a little of that feather detail.
asiostygius (edit)I recommended the D600 but it was brought to my attention you already have it.
trenchmonkey wrote:
Last looks a tad front focused AND noisy
In my opinion, noise shouldn\'t really be a point of critique, and how does manual focusing have anything to do with the camera body? - I found the D7000 to have too much noise even at ISO 400, not really anything the photog can do about that especially starting at F5.6 - I mean you can use software of course - but you would lose a little of that feather detail.
asiostygius I didn\'t find the D7100 noise was all that much better unless you downsample. It\'s hard when you are compairing it to the D700. lol - for $300 more dollars you can get a refurbished D600 and then you won\'t have to worry too much about noise - thats what I would look at if I were you - plenty of cropping for wildlife.
Cheers
trenchmonkey wrote:
Last looks a tad front focused AND noisy
In my opinion, noise shouldn\'t really be a point of critique - I found the D7000 to have too much noise even at ISO 400, not really anything the photog can do about that especially starting at F5.6 - I mean you can use software of course - but you would lose a little of that feather detail.
asiostygius I didn\'t find the D7100 noise was all that much better unless you downsample. It\'s hard when you are compairing it to the D700. lol - for $300 more dollars you can get a refurbished D600 and then you won\'t have to worry too much about noise - thats what I would look at if I were you - plenty of cropping for wildlife.
Cheers
trenchmonkey wrote:
I\'d master the D7K....before venturing into D7100 land. It\'s your money.
In my opinion, noise shouldn\'t really be a point of critique - I found the D7000 to have too much noise even at ISO 400, not really anything the photog can do about that especially starting at F5.6 - I mean you can use software of course - but you would lose a little of that feather detail.
asiostygius I didn\'t find the D7100 noise was all that much better unless you downsample. It\'s hard when you are compairing it to the D700. lol - for $300 more dollars you can get a refurbished D600 and then you won\'t have to worry too much about noise - thats what I would look at if I were you - plenty of cropping for wildlife.
Cheers
Jul 22, 2013 at 04:24 PM
Previous versions of Willy Y.'s message #11696955 « Your Best Nikon shots. »
