DTOB wrote: douglasf13 wrote:
If the X100s had a regular Bayer array, like the X100, but still had all of the other improvements, I may not have even tried the RX1...
I have yet to see someone post a photo where the x-trans sensor ruined what would have been an otherwise fantastic shot had the camera had a bayer sensor.
This is a fixed focal length camera with 16mp. I don\'t think anyone would call it a landscapers dream. However, should someone wish to do some landscaping with it it will certainly deliver if the subject matter is photogenic.
I know this is a gear forum, but some things just shouldn\'t matter as much as people make them out to.
There are about a million threads about this, with tons of examples. It\'s up to you to decide whether it is a big deal, but it is a big deal for many of us. If you don\'t print at 13x19 or larger, it may not be an issue, although I\'ve seen issues at smaller screen sizes from time to time.
I\'m not trying to turn this into another anti-X-Trans thread, but the issue should be mentioned.
Jul 04, 2013 at 06:13 PM
Previous versions of douglasf13's message #11660952 « RX1 vs X100S »
