^ ^
Did you even care to read what I wrote in my post? This is not \"just\" a web size reduction. It was carefully measured exactly to the size you would see when viewed in a 24\"x12\" spread in a wedding album. I only took a cutout of the entire 24\"x12\" image for your viewing convenience here on FM. But it\'s the same definition as the entire image.
Comparing 100% crops is useless because no client ever sees a 100% crop.
Again, I\'m not saying a 5Dclassic is in any way better than a 5DmkII. I just want to show that it is perfectly useable even for the most pixel / noise demanding output like a wedding album spread. Even @ISO3200.
^ ^
Did you even care to read what I wrote in my post? This is not \"just\" a web size reduction. It was carefully measured exactly to the size you would see when viewed in a 24\"x12\" spread in a wedding album. I only took a cutout of the entire 24\"x12\" image for your viewing convenience here on FM. But it\'s the same definition as the entire image.
You can download the entire 24x16\" image here and view it on your own monitor at home:
.html
Comparing 100% crops is useless because no client ever sees a 100% crop.
^ ^
Did you even care to read what I wrote in my post? This is not \"just\" a web size reduction. It was carefully measured exactly to the size you would see when viewed in a 24\"x12\" spread in a wedding album. I only took a cutout of the entire 24\"x12\" image for your viewing convenience here on FM. But it\'s the same definition as the entire image.
Comparing 100% crops is useless because no client ever sees a 100% crop.
May 20, 2013 at 03:14 AM
Previous versions of rabbitmountain's message #11565343 « 5D classic, please help me decide. »
