fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of timballic's message #11549851 « Using Resin ND Grad Filters degrades IQ. »

  

timballic
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Using Resin ND Grad Filters degrades IQ.


I\'ve used Neutral Density resin filters for several years now, for holding back skies in Landscape photography, and perhaps naively assumed that the term \"optical-resin\" and \"optically-pure\" meant just that, especially as all the \"top\" landscape photographers I knew were/are using them.

Recently however, whilst photographing a Landscape,(with a Tokina 100/2.8 macro), when inserting a filter whilst viewing the image on the LCD, I saw the fine twigs that I\'d used to focus on, on a distant tree, being finely distorted/mushed. (The filter in question was one from Hi-Tech, costing £30, in the 85mm size, over double that in 100mm size.)

I immediately checked my stock of ND Grad filters from Hi-Tech, and Cromatek and found that to a greater or lesser degree, they all degraded the image. I found one from Hi-Tech so bad that I got it exchanged.

I can\'t speak for Lee or Singh-Ray, as I only use the 85mm size. Perhaps they are better, for the price, they certainly ought to be!

It seems rather foolish to be buying the best quality/ most \"interesting\" lenses I can afford, and then shooting through a piece of distorting \"plastic\". What do others think?

Sorry, I had meant to shoot some with/without examples but haven\'t got round to it.

I\'d like to know if Lee/Singh-Ray have a similar effect or if \"exposure blending\" of some kind is a better way to go?



May 13, 2013 at 12:06 PM
timballic
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Using Resin ND Grad Filters degrades IQ.


I\'ve used Neutral Density resin filters for several years now, for holding back skies in Landscape photography, and perhaps naively assumed that the term \"optical-resin\" and \"optically-pure\" meant just that, especially as all the \"top\" landscape photographers I knew were/are using them.

Recently however, whilst photographing a Landscape,(with a Tokina 100/2.8 macro), when inserting a filter whilst viewing the image on the LCD, I saw the fine twigs that I\'d used to focus on, on a distant tree, being finely distorted/mushed. (The filter in question was one from Hi-Tech, costing £30, in the 85mm size, over double that in 100mm size.)

I immediately checked my stock of ND Grad filters from Hi-Tech, and Cromatek and found that to a greater or lesser degree, they all degraded the image. I found one from Hi-Tech so bad that I got it exchanged.

I can\'t speak for Lee or Singh-Ray, as I only use the 85mm size. Perhaps they are better, for the price, they certainly ought to be!

It seems rather foolish to be buying the best quality/ most \"interesting\" lenses I can afford, and then shooting through a piece of distorting \"plastic\". What do others think?

Sorry, I had meant to shoot some with/without examples but haven\'t got round to it.

I\'d like to know if Lee/Singh-Ray have a similar effect or if \"exposure blending\" of some kind is a better way to go?



May 13, 2013 at 12:06 PM





  Previous versions of timballic's message #11549851 « Using Resin ND Grad Filters degrades IQ. »