Re: Anyone up/in for a "Canon Spring 2013" Thread???
John_T wrote:
Well Peter, I think we all know that for some mysterious reason the 100-400 does not like filters, particularly \"protective\" filters, but whatever it is, I can imagine it would include a CP filter. I think my CP for the 100-400 is a Heliopan, first chance I get I\'ll give that a spin and see what I find.
John, I\'ve never had any problems with B+W UV MRC filter on 100-400. However, this CP is very different....it altered/obliterated the image quality of that good lens.
Now, on my B+W CP it says \"F-Pro\", but not \"MCR\". However, I doubt very much that would make any difference because that CP has worked very well on 24-70L, 16-35L MkI and 70-200 f/2.8 non-IS.
Re: Anyone up/in for a "Canon Spring 2013" Thread???
John_T wrote:
Well Peter, I think we all know that for some mysterious reason the 100-400 does not like filters, particularly \"protective\" filters, but whatever it is, I can imagine it would include a CP filter. I think my CP for the 100-400 is a Heliopan, first chance I get I\'ll give that a spin and see what I find.
John, I\'ve never had any problems with B+W UV MRC filter on 100-400. However, this CP is very different....it altered/obliterated the image quality of that good lens.
Now, on my B+W CP it says \"F-Pro\", but not \"MCR\". However, I doubt very much that would make any difference because that CP has worked very well on 24-70L, 16-35L MkI and 70-200 f/2.8 non-IS.
Re: Anyone up/in for a "Canon Spring 2013" Thread???
John_T wrote:
Well Peter, I think we all know that for some mysterious reason the 100-400 does not like filters, particularly \"protective\" filters, but whatever it is, I can imagine it would include a CP filter. I think my CP for the 100-400 is a Heliopan, first chance I get I\'ll give that a spin and see what I find.
John, I\'ve never had any problems with B+W UV MRC filter on 100-400. However, this CP is very different....it altered/obliterated the image quality of that good lens.
Now, on my B+W CP it say \"F-Pro\", but not \"MCR\". However, I doubt very much that would make any difference because that CP has worked very well on 24-70L, 16-35L MkI and 70-200 f/2.8 non-IS.
Here is another example. 1DX + 100-400 + CP.
Apr 15, 2013 at 07:40 PM
Previous versions of PetKal's message #11488276 « Anyone up/in for a "Canon Spring 2013" Thread??? »
