RustyBug wrote:
Okay, so the outdoor shots were blown out and the studio shots were blown out ... why would the lens variance matter @ how the sensor and jpg engine are handling the captured file? The combination of the two different settings (studio vs. outdoor) yielding similar results @ blown out highlights tells me that the camera has a tendency to blow out the highlights when using its native jpg engine ... and Fuji has recognized this by including settings to adjust the shadows/highlights/DR
It seems to me that with proper understanding of this function/feature one could use it very successfully for those times when you don\'t want to tote the larger gear.
are there really blown highlights in the IR shots? i just gave them a cursory look and didn\'t see any. i was asking about lens + sensor performance after processing each to get the maximum possible image quality. both these cameras have fantastic dynamic range shooting RAW and both allow you to adjust dynamic range for jpg. i\'ve been skipping all the talk about blown highlights in this thread cause it\'s of no importance to me (i always shoot raw or raw + jpg)
Apr 11, 2013 at 05:09 PM
Previous versions of sebboh's message #11479644 « My Fuji XE-1 outperforms my D800...... »
