Why would I be defensive about the Sigma ? I own 2 Sigma lenses and 9 Canon lenses. But the lenses you write about have nothing to do with the new Sigma 35. It\'s a huge difference in both build and optics. From Roger Cicala & LensRentals.com about that.
Roger\'s Take
Roger Cicala
President of LensRentals.com
It’s been a long time since a take was so easy. This is the sharpest 35mm made. It costs a lot less than the Canon 35 f/1.4mm or the Zeiss 35mm lenses. Any questions? It’s extremely well built and everything I’ve been able to see, inside and out, indicates quality control has really improved at Sigma.
If you’re a bokeh fanatic, you may like something else better (or maybe not, that’s a subjective call). If you need Image Stabilization, then the 35mm f/2 IS may be worthwhile. Otherwise, this is the 35mm lens.
Arguably as good or better than anything else made, and at a lower price
Mar 23, 2013 at 10:12 PM
Previous versions of Sven Jeppesen's message #11437762 « Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM first impressions »
