So, Ι know I said I wouldn\'t buy one but today I did
I was out looking for the 14/2.8 and the only shop that had both this and the x100s was one of the smaller shops in melbourne, so I asked the price out of curiocity (and having just checked online: $1,460) but for some bizarre reason the guy said $1,230
and then decided to give me a 10% discount on that, so $1,100
how do you say no to that your honor
took a walk with it in the city and yeah the camera is better than the x100 in every area that matters, AF, MF, EVF, IQ, write speed (I think).
Here\'s a photo
I used it with LR4.4 and I noticed that the dngs, to my eyes, are clearly sharpened. I gave it a slight touch of clarity/sharpening in LR (it looked like it could use it) and it started introducing a little bit of that watercolouring thing which you might be a able to notice on the crop above. But I really feel I\'m splitting hairs here, these files are so big that I\'m pretty sure it would be impossible to see even in 1m prints
The camera is good, I agree with Arias it\'s probably the best Fuji X at the moment
Mar 23, 2013 at 08:09 AM
Previous versions of Spyro P.'s message #11436253 « Zack Arias Fuji X100s review is out »
