Re: “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
mortyb wrote:
Can\'t really explain why, but I much prefer the Hasselblad shot.
Probably in large part because it has a heck of a lot more detail/sharpness/contrast than a 35/1.2, wide open, struggling against typical ultra-fast lens aberrations to resolve the image at all.
Feb 03, 2013 at 04:57 PM
Previous versions of mpmendenhall's message #11321919 « “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter »
