Re: “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter
I know what you mean, and I do agree. I probably worded it incorrectly, and didn\'t mean it to sound like the two were \"equivalent\". I have shot with my own Leica R lens on crop and FF, and Zeiss C/Y, and there is a look that I can\'t replicate on m4/3rds for sure.
What I did mean was that those situations/looks are more rare than some might imagine, and that in many instances, it would be hard to tell the difference. Not all cases, of course, but for me, I was surprised to find that I was very happy with m4/3rds more than I was expecting (and I was expecting only the size/weight to be the boon, and ready to take a major hit in IQ).
I do love those Leica R and Zeiss threads though. Some wonderful images in there, although in large part their quality should also be attributed to the talent of the person pulling the trigger, not just the gear!
dc
Feb 03, 2013 at 10:03 AM
Previous versions of bmwrider75's message #11320927 « “Full Frame Equivalence” and Why It Doesn’t Matter »
