Here\'s a sharpened copy (more sharpening for Nex) with a little PP to remove the color artifacts. Some zippering artifacts are still there.
?nc=578
I guess the difference between what I\'m saying and what you and Lan11 are saying is that I believe this is 100% software related. You keep telling people that even with proper conversion, trans x can never compete with bayer at low ISO. I think this thread has done a good job of proving that false, even without proper raw support. If you want to keep bringing up \"chroma resolution\" in every thread that involves Fuji, that\'s fine but the real issue you should be pointing out is Raw support.
Fine, here\'s a sharpened copy (more sharpening for Nex) with a little PP to remove the color artifacts. Some zippering artifacts are still there.
?nc=578
I guess the difference between what I\'m saying and what you and Lan11 are saying is that I believe this is 100% software related. You keep telling people that even with proper conversion, trans x can never compete with bayer at low ISO. I think this thread has done a good job of proving that false, even without proper raw support. If you want to keep bringing up \"chroma resolution\" in every thread that involves Fuji, that\'s fine but the real issue you should be pointing out is Raw support.
Dec 18, 2012 at 01:50 PM
Previous versions of flashinm's message #11201547 « Fuji XPro1 vs Nex 5n Comparision Images »
