FlyPenFly wrote:
If we\'re not doing a bokeh test, I would put up a $100 to say that in a double blind test, nobody will be able to accurately point out which was the D700 shot vs OM-D for a given scene post processed by myself in 1024 width.
Question is; why would I choose a system depending on how you process your images? Of course I meant my own images, processed by me. I know several people who constantly screw up any image from their $$$ gear, making them look like they were shot with a cellphone camera.
Edit: If one is happy with the OM-D and can\'t see a difference, that\'s great! I wish it applied to me, but it doesn\'t and I use the cameras for different occasions. Mostly the OM-D because I hate the weight of the D700, and I got the 20/1.7 again yesterday, because I need to restrict my use of gear. I also have the better 25/1.4 but I don\'t like the size of it.
FlyPenFly wrote:
If we\'re not doing a bokeh test, I would put up a $100 to say that in a double blind test, nobody will be able to accurately point out which was the D700 shot vs OM-D for a given scene post processed by myself in 1024 width.
Question is; why would I choose a system depending on how you process your images? Of course I meant my own images, processed by me. I know several people who constantly screw up any image from their $$$ gear, making them look like they were shot with a cellphone camera.
Nov 06, 2012 at 04:57 PM
Previous versions of Makten's message #11097244 « D700 to M43? »
Of course I meant my own images, processed by me. I know several people who constantly screw up any image from their $$$ gear, making them look like they were shot with a cellphone camera.