I\'m curious what others think about his first observation. That higher pixel densities require more care to look sharp at 100% views is no surprise. The statement that higher pixel densities require more technique even when both images are viewed at the same reproduction size is surprising: he\'s essentially saying that images with slight motion blur from high-mexapixel cameras don\'t downsize cleanly, and not only do they not look better than a lower mexapixel camera, he claims they look worse (less perceptually sharp).
IMO, that possible lack of sharpness due to interpolation artifacts can be overcome in PP. What do others think?
Nov 05, 2012 at 09:46 AM
Previous versions of alwang's message #11093422 « Ming Thein on pixel density and sharpness »
