Many people (including myself) are waiting for Canon to release an equivalent to Nikon\'s legendary 14-24.
If Canon were to make this lens, it would have to be at least as good as Nikon\'s version, a.k.a the best UWA zoom in the world, and that is where the problem is.
This would mean that the 14-24L would have to blow the 16-35L, 17-40L, and even the 24L and 14L out of the water. (Yes, the Nikon 14-24 is that good.)
How would this lens work with Canons marketing machine? A price tag of 3k?
I just can\'t see them making a UWA zoom that \"kills\" two of their UWA prime lenses.
Many people (including myself) are waiting for Canon to release an equivalent to Nikon\'s legendary 14-24.
If Canon were to make this lens, it would have to be at least as good as Nikon\'s version, a.k.a the best UWA zoom in the world, and that is where the problem is.
This means that the 14-24L would have to blow the 16-35L, 17-40L, and even the 24L and 14L out of the water. (yes, the Nikon 14-24 is that good!)
How would this work with Canons marketing machine? A price tag of 3k?
I just can\'t see them making a UWA zoom that \"kills\" two of their UWA prime lenses.
Oct 25, 2012 at 09:53 AM
Previous versions of Rickuz's message #11067683 « Why Canon won't make a 14-24 L »
