^^^ I dunno anything about the device you\'re mentioning but just from the things you listed I\'d say it was a pathetic waste of time, money and space! No thanks!
FlyPenFly wrote:
Haha not use the system hard. I guess that depend what you mean. I have VMWare instances running with Visual Studio while also running XCode on a hacked MBP that I installed an SSD and removed the optical drive to do a RAID 0 SSD setup.
I\'m also running dual 27\" monitors on my 27\" iMac with the high res thunderbolt display adapter while running thunderbolt RAID0 through a hacked together Lacie solution. I also opened up this iMac 27, added a specialty SATA splitter so I can run an internal SSD in addition to the internal SATA drive that is required to be in there for firmware based temperature monitoring and fan regulation.
This while multiple computers are all networked together with VNC and Synergy.
There are tons of things worth complaining about OSX and Windows, stability isn\'t really one of them in general. There are some cross WIndows/OSX/Samba reliability issues that I can\'t get my head around but other than that my biggest computing complaint is color accuracy even when using monitor color calibration tools like a Spyder and the speed of Lightroom 4. They really need to offload to GPU a lot of high math functions.
Yeah, that doesn\'t really show hard use. Just a rather varied setup.
Now if you had thousands of files moving and being processed in various ways (per minute or per second) to and from each of those sup-systems then yeah... maybe. How you have your system setup (elaborate or simple) is different from system stress.
Oct 15, 2012 at 12:08 PM
Previous versions of Bifurcator's message #11043060 « I think i'm going to buy a windows 8 tablet »
