fredmiranda.com
Forum
Presentation Boards
Nature & Wildlife
Landscape Photography
City, Street & Architecture
People Photography
Black & White Photography
Macro & Still Life
Sports Photography
Wedding Photography
Digital Art, Smartphone & Abstract
Trip Location Advice & Meet-ups
Gear Talk
Canon Forum
Nikon Forum
Sony Forum
Leica & Alternative Gear
Fuji Forum
Film Is Not Dead
Micro Four Thirds Forum
Latest Photography News
General Gear-talk
Pro Digital Corner
Lighting & Studio Techniques
Post-processing & Printing
Forum & Miscellaneous
Assignments
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Photo Critique
Buy & Sell
Photo Gear
Tech Tools
Tips for Safe Transactions
Guidelines & Rules
Join Today
What's New
Latest Posts
FM Gear Reviews
Assignment Winners
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Category Winners
Landscape Photography
Nature & Wildlife
People Photography
Register
Login
Forum
Buy & Sell
What's New
Register
Login
fredmiranda.com
Login
Previous versions of
alundeb
's message
#11004549
« Your choice of body for wildlife? »
alundeb
Offline
Upload & Sell
:
Off
Re: Your choice of body for wildlife?
PetKal wrote
:
Anders, that is a good illustration of sensor pixel density effects.
Now, since your Pentax appears to have much higher \"reach\" than 5D, why don\'t you try to shoot the same scene, from the same distance, with:
Pentax + 85mm f/1.4
5D + 400 f/5.6
Peter, I mentioned \"reach\" as a tongue-in-cheek provocation, but your proposed test is interesting.
It may not be exactly the lenses you mention, but will you accept these premises for the test:
- Same distance to subject
- Same Field Of View
- Same Depth of Field
- Same shutter speed
- Approximately the same number of pixels per image (this will imply a slight cropping of the 5DII)
Sep 30, 2012 at 07:02 AM
Previous versions of
alundeb
's message
#11004549
« Your choice of body for wildlife? »