I need a completely clear day to do some flare testing and specular highlight bokeh under unchanging conditions. Hopefully this weekend(?)
I suppose what I am seeing in these comparisons isn\'t so much how excellent the ZE is but how closely the Zuiko is keeping up with it and in the case of CA/fringing, bettering it. At F2 I may even prefer the Zuiko\'s rendering, (but it\'s so close), whilst stopped down a bit, the \"bite\" of the ZE becomes more apparent.
The slightly \"muddier\" colours of the Tokina are showing, but it\'s not lagging by very much at all IMO.
I need a completely clear day to do some flare testing and specular highlight bokeh under unchanging conditions. Hopefully this weekend(?)
I suppose what I am seeing in these comparisons isn\'t so much how excellent the ZE is but how closely the Zuiko is keeping up with it and in the case of CA/fringing, bettering it. At F2 I may even prefer the Zuiko\'s rendering, (but it\'s so close), whilst stopped down a bit, the \"bite\" of the ZE becomes more apparent.
The slightly \"muddier\" colours of the Tokina are showing, but it\'s not lagging by very much at all.
Sep 11, 2012 at 03:48 AM
Previous versions of timballic's message #10951826 « OM Zuiko 100mm F2 cf. Zeiss ZE Makro Planar 100mm F2 »
