Greggf wrote:
Very nice camel shot! fantastic perspective!
I like the last shot above uhoh7!
Just curious if anyone has any experience with the ZM 2.8/25 Biogon? How would you describe it? Is that a better choice than the Zeiss 1.8/24??
Gregg
TY sir,
Philber is dead on. Many had very high hopes for the ZM 25, since it is so sharp on film. It\'s still good, but not like on film. The ZM 28 may be better.
But for landscapes it would be far superior to the sony 24, That said, the sony is VERY good close in, and a full stop at 24mm is huge. When the sun goes down the sony will rule
For the price of either, you could get a CV 28/2 or 1.9 AND a CV 20 (latter good on 5n--not sure on 7)
I was switching lenses fast, but these may all be with the Canon RF 100/2
I like that skyscraper shot, S and nice one there frezeiss.
Greggf wrote:
Very nice camel shot! fantastic perspective!
I like the last shot above uhoh7!
Just curious if anyone has any experience with the ZM 2.8/25 Biogon? How would you describe it? Is that a better choice than the Zeiss 1.8/24??
Gregg
TY sir,
Many had very high hopes for the ZM 25, since it is so sharp on film. It\'s still good, but not like on film. The ZM 28 may be better.
But for landscapes it would be far superior to the sony 24, That said, the sony is VERY good close in, and a full stop at 24mm is huge. When the sun goes down the sony will rule
For the price of either, you could get a CV 28/2 or 1.9 AND a CV 20 (latter good on 5n--not sure on 7)
I was switching lenses fast, but these may all be with the Canon RF 100/2
Sep 06, 2012 at 08:26 AM
Previous versions of uhoh7's message #10939235 « Sony (APS-C) Images Thread »