I appreciate the comments/work on my Zebra picture. Thank you uz2work - JohnT - Liquidstone - Pixel Perfect - TeamSpeed
I will say that is one of the better looking ISO3200 images I\'ve seen from my camera as I\'m usually verydisappointed by the noise at that level. But still pretty amazing one can generate semi-decent images at that low of light.
Les: I knew a bit underexposed ... but I had run out of light and felt 1/6s shutter speed was already pushing it. Appreciate your \"turn off the LR sharpening\" and I\'m going to have to add that step to my processing ... in fact, I think I may just default to ZERO sharpening for the RAW conversion as I typically do in Photoshop as the very last step after any cropping/resizing.
Romy: Good suggestion to \"double process\" - I\'ve actually done that when I\'ve had stuff like indoor shots with blown-out windows ... highlight recovery on steroids! ;-) But yea, never thought about doing on the other end of the light spectrum.
P.S. On the \"lighter note\" (pun intended), here\'s a fun little picture from the earlier in the same trip to Kenya - focus isn\'t dead on as you can see in the actual pixels shown in the 2nd image which is ISO 800, F/2.8, 1/100s ... but this was a fleeting capture. This is also an example of what I consider annoying noise even at ISO 800 ... so I may have to go back and try to clean it up after this informational thread! ;-)
I appreciate the comments/work on my Zebra picture. Thank you uz2work - JohnT - Liquidstone - Pixel Perfect - TeamSpeed
I will say that is one of the better looking ISO3200 images I\'ve seen from my camera as I\'m usually disappointed by the noise at that level. But still pretty amazing one can generate semi-decent images at that low of light.
Les: I knew a bit underexposed ... but I had run out of light and felt 1/6s shutter speed was already pushing it. Appreciate your \"turn off the LR sharpening\" and I\'m going to have to add that step to my processing ... in fact, I think I may just default to ZERO sharpening for the RAW conversion as I typically do in Photoshop as the very last step after any cropping/resizing.
Romy: Good suggestion to \"double process\" - I\'ve actually done that when I\'ve had stuff like indoor shots with blown-out windows ... highlight recovery on steroids! ;-) But yea, never thought about doing on the other end of the light spectrum.
P.S. On the \"lighter note\" (pun intended), here\'s a fun little picture from the earlier in the same trip to Kenya - focus isn\'t dead on as you can see in the actual pixels shown in the 2nd image which is ISO 800, F/2.8, 1/100s ... but this was a fleeting capture. I may have to go back and try to clean up some more of the noise after this informational thread! ;-)
I appreciate the comments/work on my Zebra picture. Thank you uz2work - JohnT - Liquidstone - Pixel Perfect - TeamSpeed
I will say that is one of the better looking ISO3200 images I\'ve seen from my camera as I\'m usually disappointed by the noise at that level. But still pretty amazing one can generate semi-decent images at that low of light.
Les: I knew a bit underexposed ... but I had run out of light and felt 1/6s shutter speed was already pushing it. Appreciate your \"turn off the LR sharpening\" and I\'m going to have to add that step to my processing ... in fact, I think I may just default to ZERO sharpening for the RAW conversion as I typically do in Photoshop as the very last step after any cropping/resizing.
Romy: Good suggestion to \"double process\" - I\'ve actually done that when I\'ve had stuff like indoor shots with blown-out windows ... highlight recovery on steroids! ;-) But yea, never thought about doing on the other end of the light spectrum.
P.S. On the \"lighter note\" (pun intended), here\'s a fun little picture from the earlier in the same trip to Kenya - actual pixel shown in the 2nd image which is ISO 800, F/2.8, 1/100s ... I may have to go back and try to clean up some more).
I appreciate the comments/work on my Zebra picture. Thank you uz2work - JohnT - Liquidstone - Pixel Perfect - TeamSpeed
I will say that is one of the better looking ISO3200 images I\'ve seen from my camera as I\'m usually disappointed by the noise at that level. But still pretty amazing one can generate semi-decent images at that low of light.
P.S. Yes Les, I knew a bit underexposed ... but I had run out of light and felt 1/6s shutter speed was already pushing it. Appreciate your \"turn off the LR sharpening\" and I\'m going to have to add that step to my processing ... in fact, I think I may just default to ZERO sharpening for the RAW conversion as I typically do in Photoshop as the very last step after any cropping/resizing.
PPS. Romy: Good suggestion to \"double process\" - I\'ve actually done that when I\'ve had stuff like indoor shots with blown-out windows ... highlight recovery on steroids! ;-) But yea, never thought about doing on the other end of the light spectrum.
Sep 04, 2012 at 12:48 PM
Previous versions of Alek Komarnits's message #10934068 « How noisy is your 7D? »
