Makten wrote:
This is interesting. I actually get lower per-pixel sharpness with the Zeiss 35/1.4 on D700 than with the Panasonic 25/1.4 on OM-D. The look is of course different, but even with the higher pixel count and tiny sensor, the OM-D wins regarding pure per-pixel sharpness.
I have to say that 100% crops from MFT usually look a bit more \"digital\" to me. Pixel level detail looks more processed and bokeh doesn\'t have any \"texture\" which makes it look as if it was made with gaussian blur in PS (whereas bokeh on FF looks a bit more organic an usually has more structure/grain). That\'s purely on the pixel peeping level though, but for me it\'s the giveaway telling me that I\'m looking at an images shot with MFT. Maybe it\'s also a lack of tonal gradations that causes this different look and I\'d expect digital MF backs to be superior to FF in this departement too.
Aug 23, 2012 at 07:35 AM
Previous versions of AhamB's message #10903833 « How much sharpness do you need? »
