vovkinson wrote: FlyPenFly wrote:
You know, personally I\'d rather have an X2 than a X100... even at double.
I tried X2 and it did not show me any leica character.
This is probably not the best example to illustrate the difference between X2 & M9 but I expected more from the X2 anyway. I know this not a fair comparison (summilux 50 1.4 & elmarit 28 2.8) but X2 image is pale and lifeless for 2K camera. I don\'t care if it\'s leica, fuji or olympus if it makes $hitty images.
100% crop. Converted from RAW files. No white balancing , no sharpening have been applied.
That\'s because the X2 is not a \"real\" Leica! It\'s pretty much made almost entirely in Japan and assembled just enough in Germany so Leica can put their Made in Germany stamp on it. Probably made by Sigma, Fuji or someone similar.
Aug 12, 2012 at 03:00 PM
Previous versions of Tariq Gibran's message #10877145 « "Best" Mirrorless Camera with Viewfinder? »
