Every so often I yield to a temptation and go shoot somewhat difficult BIF with 800L. And it never fails, always a frustrating endeavour, with a major drop in keeper rate compared to much more suitable (and some significantly cheaper) lenses such as 400 f/5.6 or 400 DO or 300 f/2.8 IS etc.
Here and there though I do get an interesting BIF shot or two even with 800L.
Every so often I yield to a temptation and go shoot somewhat difficult BIF with 800L. And it never fails, always a frustrating endeavour, with a major drop in keeper rate compared to much more suitable (and some significantly cheaper) lenses such as 400 f/5.6 or 400 DO or 300 f/2.8 IS etc.
Here and there though I do get an interesting BIF shot or two even with 800L.
Every so often I yield to a temptation and go shoot somewhat difficult BIF with 800L. And it never fails, always a frustrating endeavour, with a major drop in keeper rate compared to much more suitable (and some significantly cheaper) lenses such as 400 f/5.6 or 400 DO or 300 f/2.8 IS etc.
Here and there though I do get an interesting BIF shot or two even with 800L.
Every so often I yield to a temptation and go shoot somewhat difficult BIF with 800L. And it never fails, always a frustrating endeavour, with a major drop in keeper rate compared to much more suitable (and some significantly cheaper) lenses such as 400 f/5.6 or 400 DO or 300 f/2.8 IS etc.
Here and there though I do get an interesting BIF shot or two even with 800L.
Every so often I yield to a temptation and go shoot somewhat difficult BIF with 800L. And it never fails, always a frustrating endeavour, with a major drop in keeper rate compared to much more suitable (and some significantly cheaper) lenses such as 400 f/5.6 or 400 DO or 300 f/2.8 IS etc.
Here and there though I do get an interesting BIF shot or two even with 800L.
Handheld 1DMkIIN + 800L.
Jul 20, 2012 at 06:22 PM
Previous versions of PetKal's message #10820750 « Summer photography with Canon equipment »