goosemang wrote:
what this thread should really say is \"i don\'t really need a telephoto but i want to blow some money\"
i mean if we\'re being honest
plenty of nice places to go for $1000
but the 70-200 2.8 non-IS is pretty nice, only the 70-200 f/4 IS, 70-200 2.8 IS II and 70-300L are sharper, it\'s a great sports lens for wide angle field or indoor sports
Jul 19, 2012 at 09:51 PM
Previous versions of skibum5's message #10818372 « convince me not to buy a 70-200 f2.8 non-IS »
