bobbytan wrote:
it is only slightly better, to me.
The intense \"purple (& green) fringe\" in the house images (tree branches & trunks) are not exactly what I would call a \"slight\" difference.
Resolving capability doesn\'t seem \"slight\" here either ... and given the format \"dof advantage, an attempted argument @ \"slight\" focal point variance doesn\'t hold much water to explain the detail difference (at least not for me).
Then the distortion variance of the trees and even the fence make for three things that are significantly different:
Aberration
Resolution
Distortion
Sure, depending on your usage, they might not be \"as noticeable\" or \"as critical\" ... and yes, they can be somewhat corrected in post ... but these aren\'t \"slight\" differences in my book.
bobbytan wrote:
it is only slightly better, to me.
The intense \"purple (& green) fringe\" in the house images (tree branches & trunks) are not exactly what I would call a \"slight\" difference.
Resolving capability doesn\'t seem \"slight\" here either ... and given the format \"dof advantage, an attempted argument @ \"slight\" focal point variance doesn\'t hold much water to explain the detail difference (at least not for me).
Then the distortion variance of the trees and even the fence make for three things that are significantly different:
Aberration
Resolution
Distortion
Sure, depending on your usage, they might not be \"as noticeable\" or \"as critical\" ... and yes, they can be somewhat corrected in post ... but these aren\'t \"slight\" in my book.
