Yes, Scott, probably a bit less vignette might be better. (I\'m lowering the opacity on the vignette layer to 20%.) Yes, the brightest part of the sky was deliberately blown to white where the sun was brightest because that\'s what the sunrise looked like - too bright to hold detail even with the greater log range of my Mark I eyeball. Blowing out bright sunlight is sometimes the best way to render it.
And the the orange shape was some sort of smoke/water vapor that contrasted to the sky. I kept it \'cause I like it.
Yes, Scott, probably a bit less vignette might be better. (I\'m lowing the opacity on the vignette layer to 20%.) Yes, the brightest part of the sky was deliberately blown to white where the sun was brightest because that\'s what the sunrise looked like - too bright to hold detail even with the greater log range of my Mark I eyeball. Blowing out bright sunlight is sometimes the best way to render it.
And the the orange shape was some sort of smoke/water vapor that contrasted to the sky. I kept it \'cause I like it.
Yes, Scott, probably a bit less vignette might be better. The sky was deliberately blown to white where the sun was brightest because that\'s what the sunrise looked like - too bright to hold detail even with the greater log range of my Mark I eyeball.
And the the orange shape was some sort of smoke/water vapor that contrasted to the sky. I kept it \'cause I like it.
Jul 13, 2012 at 08:52 PM
Previous versions of AuntiPode's message #10802607 « Cologne Cathedral at sunrise »
