Sami Ruusunen wrote:
One has to also consider that when making images for web presentation, theres currently a very large difference on screen resolutions, on the other end theres a people using minilaptops and iphones for web browsing and on the other end theres 30\" high quality screens. Photographers usually use screens with high pixel density so most of the images are bit oversharpened for the majority of the viewers.
Indeeed. I was a bit disappointed with the pixel size of my 24\" 1920x1200 screen when I first got it (coming from a 30\" 2560x1600 screen). It makes sharpening artifacts more visible.
@Carsten: To me, your version of the composite image doesn\'t look very sharp in the fine details, but kind of coarse and grainy. James\' version looks a bit cleaner, IMO.
Sami Ruusunen wrote:
One has to also consider that when making images for web presentation, theres currently a very large difference on screen resolutions, on the other end theres a people using minilaptops and iphones for web browsing and on the other end theres 30\" high quality screens. Photographers usually use screens with high pixel density so most of the images are bit oversharpened for the majority of the viewers.
Indeeed. I was a bit disappointed with the pixel size of my 24\" 1920x1200 screen when I first got it (coming from a 30\" 2560x1600 screen). It makes sharpening artifacts more visible.
@Carsten: To me, your version of the composite image doesn\'t look very sharp in the fine details, but kind of coarse and grainy. James\' version looks a bit cleaner, IMO.
Sami Ruusunen wrote:
One has to also consider that when making images for web presentation, theres currently a very large difference on screen resolutions, on the other end theres a people using minilaptops and iphones for web browsing and on the other end theres 30\" high quality screens. Photographers usually use screens with high pixel density so most of the images are bit oversharpened for the majority of the viewers.
Indeeed. I was a bit disappointed with the pixel size of my 24\" 1920x1200 screen when I first got it (coming from a 30\" 2560x1600 screen). It makes sharpening artifacts more visible.
@Carsten: To me, your version of the composite image doesn\'t look very sharp in the fine details, but kind of coarse and grainy. James\' version looks a bit cleaner, IMO.
Sami Ruusunen wrote:
One has to also consider that when making images for web presentation, theres currently a very large difference on screen resolutions, on the other end theres a people using minilaptops and iphones for web browsing and on the other end theres 30\" high quality screens. Photographers usually use screens with high pixel density so most of the images are bit oversharpened for the majority of the viewers.
Indeeed. I was a bit disappointed with the pixel size of my 24\" 1920x1200 screen when I first got it (coming from a 30\" 2560x1600 screen). It makes sharpening artifacts more visible.
@Carsten: To me, your version of the composite image doesn\'t look very sharp in the fine details, but kind of coarse and grainy. James\' version looks a bit cleaner, IMO.
Sami Ruusunen wrote:
One has to also consider that when making images for web presentation, theres currently a very large difference on screen resolutions, on the other end theres a people using minilaptops and iphones for web browsing and on the other end theres 30\" high quality screens. Photographers usually use screens with high pixel density so most of the images are bit oversharpened for the majority of the viewers.
Indeeed. I was a bit disappointed with the pixel size of my 24\" 1920x1200 screen when I first got it (coming from a 30\" 2560x1600 screen). It makes sharpening artifacts more visible.
@Carsten: To me, your version of the composite image doesn\'t look very sharp in the fine details, but kind of coarse and grainy. James\' version looks a bit cleaner, IMO.
Sami Ruusunen wrote:
One has to also consider that when making images for web presentation, theres currently a very large difference on screen resolutions, on the other end theres a people using minilaptops and iphones for web browsing and on the other end theres 30\" high quality screens. Photographers usually use screens with high pixel density so most of the images are bit oversharpened for the majority of the viewers.
Indeeed. I was a bit disappointed with the pixel size of my 24\" 1920x1200 screen when I first got it (coming from a 30\" 2560x1600 screen). It makes sharpening artifacts more visible.
@Carsten: To me, your version of the composite image doesn\'t look very sharp in the fine details, but kind of coarse and grainy. James\' version looks a bit cleaner, IMO.
Sami Ruusunen wrote:
One has to also consider that when making images for web presentation, theres currently a very large difference on screen resolutions, on the other end theres a people using minilaptops and iphones for web browsing and on the other end theres 30\" high quality screens. Photographers usually use screens with high pixel density so most of the images are bit oversharpened for the majority of the viewers.
Indeeed. I was a bit disappointed with the pixel size of my 24\" 1920x1200 screen when I first got it (coming from a 30\" 2560x1600 screen). It makes sharpening artifacts more visible.
@Carsten: Your version of the composite image doesn\'t look very sharp in the fine details to me, but it does look kind of coarse and grainy to me. James\' version looks a bit cleaner.
Sami Ruusunen wrote:
One has to also consider that when making images for web presentation, theres currently a very large difference on screen resolutions, on the other end theres a people using minilaptops and iphones for web browsing and on the other end theres 30\" high quality screens. Photographers usually use screens with high pixel density so most of the images are bit oversharpened for the majority of the viewers.
Indeeed. I was a bit disappointed with the pixel size of my 24\" 1920x1200 screen when I first got it (coming from a 30\" 2560x1600 screen). It makes sharpening artifacts more visible.
@Carsten: Your version of the composite image doesn\'t look very sharp in the fine details to me, but it does look kind of coarse and grainy to me. James\' version looks much cleaner.
Sami Ruusunen wrote:
One has to also consider that when making images for web presentation, theres currently a very large difference on screen resolutions, on the other end theres a people using minilaptops and iphones for web browsing and on the other end theres 30\" high quality screens. Photographers usually use screens with high pixel density so most of the images are bit oversharpened for the majority of the viewers.
Indeeed. I was a bit disappointed with the pixel size of my 24\" 1920x1200 screen when I first got it (coming from a 30\" 2560x1600 screen). It makes sharpening artifacts more visible.
