Re: Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 and f/2 at each other's best
Lars Johnsson wrote: wiseguy010 wrote: Jochenb wrote: Samuli Vahonen wrote: wiseguy010 wrote:
Where are the comparison shots?
Rent 1.4 and shoot them yourself - no smiley, I\'m serious, if you really want prove your point you have no other choice... It takes quite lot of time&effort and at least I have zero interest to do it since it\'s quite obvious without any comparisons that I\'ll never have any use for 2/35 anymore, at least for any reason relevant to optical performance.
Samuli
I fully agree Samuli.
Wiseguy, I don\'t need to prove anything. What\'s your problem with people preferring the f1.4?
For the discussion (and answer to the OP) it would be nice to give some examples. But if you don\'t want to do that, it is OK with me. A hand full of real world comparisons would be nice though. But that is apparently too difficult or too much trouble.
I don\'t have a problem with people preferring the 1.4. Why do you think I have a problem with that? I only give my opinion about the two lenses.
But why don\'t you you post some comparison? Or some sample pics from those lenses?
Why would you like all the others to do it, but not you?
Why should I. I am not interested in buying the 35/1.4 and I don\'t have one. Buying or renting one only for some tests here, is quite silly. I have seen more than enough pictures of the 35/2 and 35/1.4 to state that there are hardly any differences in real world photography between the two.
I am not the one stating that the 1.4 is much better than the 2 without any prove.
But this discussion is leading nowhere. I made my point and hope that is has some value for the OP.
By the way, I posted quite some 35/2 pictures on this forum.
Re: Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 and f/2 at each other's best
Lars Johnsson wrote: wiseguy010 wrote: Jochenb wrote: Samuli Vahonen wrote: wiseguy010 wrote:
Where are the comparison shots?
Rent 1.4 and shoot them yourself - no smiley, I\'m serious, if you really want prove your point you have no other choice... It takes quite lot of time&effort and at least I have zero interest to do it since it\'s quite obvious without any comparisons that I\'ll never have any use for 2/35 anymore, at least for any reason relevant to optical performance.
Samuli
I fully agree Samuli.
Wiseguy, I don\'t need to prove anything. What\'s your problem with people preferring the f1.4?
For the discussion (and answer to the OP) it would be nice to give some examples. But if you don\'t want to do that, it is OK with me. A hand full of real world comparisons would be nice though. But that is apparently too difficult or too much trouble.
I don\'t have a problem with people preferring the 1.4. Why do you think I have a problem with that? I only give my opinion about the two lenses.
But why don\'t you you post some comparison? Or some sample pics from those lenses?
Why would you like all the others to do it, but not you?
Why should I. I am not interested in buying the 35/1.4 and I don\'t have one. Buying or renting one only for some tests here, is quite silly. I have seen more than enough pictures of the 35/2 and 35/1.4 to state that there are hardly any differences in real world photography between the two.
I am not the one stating that the 1.4 is much better than the 2 without any prove.
But this discussion is leading nowhere. I made my point and hope that is has some value for the OP.
May 17, 2012 at 11:33 AM
Previous versions of wiseguy010's message #10643466 « Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 and f/2 at each other's best »
