RustyBug wrote:
... yet they insist on arguing their staunch position of \"no difference\"...
Well, maybe I haven\'t paid that much attention, but I didn\'t notice many people vociferously arguing that there\'s no difference. A lot of people do say \"Nope, can\'t see it, no difference to my eyes\", but that\'s not exactly the same, isn\'t it?
Besides, to complicate things, there is the matter of framing. Take a some wine and pour it into two bottles. Put different labels on them. Now tell your group of testers that in bottle #1 is a famous wine which sells for hundreds of dollars per bottle, it\'s rare and exquisite. Tell them that in bottle #2 is a common \"California red\". Ask them to taste, review, and rate the wines.
I am sure you can guess what the testers will taste, smell, and feel :-)
Apr 18, 2012 at 11:07 AM
Previous versions of KaaX's message #10555150 « Next "Zeiss isn't any different" thread ... »
