fredmiranda.com
Forum
Presentation Boards
Nature & Wildlife
Landscape Photography
City, Street & Architecture
People Photography
Black & White Photography
Macro & Still Life
Sports Photography
Wedding Photography
Digital Art, Smartphone & Abstract
Trip Location Advice & Meet-ups
Gear Talk
Canon Forum
Nikon Forum
Sony Forum
Leica & Alternative Gear
Fuji Forum
Film Is Not Dead
Micro Four Thirds Forum
Latest Photography News
General Gear-talk
Pro Digital Corner
Lighting & Studio Techniques
Post-processing & Printing
Forum & Miscellaneous
Assignments
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Photo Critique
Buy & Sell
Photo Gear
Tech Tools
Tips for Safe Transactions
Guidelines & Rules
Join Today
What's New
Latest Posts
FM Gear Reviews
Assignment Winners
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Category Winners
Landscape Photography
Nature & Wildlife
People Photography
Register
Login
Forum
Buy & Sell
What's New
Register
Login
fredmiranda.com
Login
Previous versions of
AhamB
's message
#10553748
« Next "Zeiss isn't any different" thread ... »
AhamB
Offline
Upload & Sell
:
Off
Re: Next "Zeiss isn't any different" thread ...
Bifurcator wrote
:
That\'s a total cop out for not being good enough to tell.
I have to agree though. I\'d throw the camera you used in the trash (i.e. pretty useless for use with legacy full frame lenses, esp. wide angles).
Also, the subject matter is so boring that I don\'t know what kind of \"magic\" any lens could add to it.
Apr 17, 2012 at 10:38 PM
AhamB
Offline
Upload & Sell
:
Off
Re: Next "Zeiss isn't any different" thread ...
Bifurcator wrote
:
That\'s a total cop out for not being good enough to tell.
I have to agree though. I\'d throw the camera you used in the trash (i.e. pretty useless for use with legacy full frame lenses, esp. wide angles).
Apr 17, 2012 at 10:32 PM
Previous versions of
AhamB
's message
#10553748
« Next "Zeiss isn't any different" thread ... »