trenchmonkey wrote: Great thing about the 200 f2.8L....it\'s BLACK
With the current offering of the 70-200 f/2.8L IS Mk II, I can\'t see myself getting a 200 f/2.8L. There may be application for some, but if I\'m going fixed 200mm, it\'s going to be the 200 f/2L IS (but we\'ll save that discussion for another day). Even @ that, if you\'re looking @ adding ~200mm @ f/2.8, I\'d get something with a bit of flexibility, so to answer your question, 70-200 f/2.8L, or 80-200 f/2.8L.
However, the 70-200 f/2.8L IS Mk II is that good!
And, it\'ll give you a nice 280mm f/4 with the 1.4 TC and have IS also, with a very nice MFD!!!
With the current offering of the 70-200 f/2.8L IS Mk II, I can\'t see myself getting a 200 f/2.8L. There may be application for some, but if I\'m going fixed 200mm, it\'s going to be the 200 f/2L IS (but we\'ll save that discussion for another day). Even @ that, if you\'re looking @ adding ~200mm @ f/2.8, I\'d get something with a bit of flexibility, so to answer your question, 70-200 f/2.8L, or 80-200 f/2.8L.
However, the 70-200 f/2.8L IS Mk II is that good!
And, it\'ll give you a nice 280mm f/4 with the 1.4 TC and have IS also, with a very nice MFD!!!
trenchmonkey wrote:Great thing about the 200 f2.8L....it\'s BLACK
With the current offering of the 70-200 f/2.8L IS Mk II, I can\'t see myself getting a 200 f/2.8L. There may be application for some, but if I\'m going fixed 200mm, it\'s going to be the 200 f/2L IS (but we\'ll save that discussion for another day). Even @ that, if you\'re looking @ adding ~200mm @ f/2.8, I\'d get something with a bit of flexibility, so to answer your question, 70-200 f/2.8L, or 80-200 f/2.8L.
However, the 70-200 f/2.8L IS Mk II is that good!
And, it\'ll give you a nice 280mm f/4 with the 1.4 TC and have IS also, with a very nice MFD!!!
Apr 15, 2012 at 01:01 PM
Previous versions of reno.peterson's message #10545269 « Question on 70-200 2.8 and 200 2.8 »
trenchmonkey wrote: Great thing about the 200 f2.8L....it\'s BLACK 
