digitalbug30d wrote: chez wrote:
I see the boys who never have a banding issue still keep popping into this thread just to be heard again. Why is that? Surely Frued must have a term for this.
just like when one sees things that arnt there...LSD,Psychotic break....
;-)
digitalbug30d wrote:
you can keep using your camera as a lab test tool fine by me..
double ;-)
skibum5 wrote:
maybe your only experience is with studio and set shots, natural world photography, random on the spot photography, is a different game
That\'s where I shoot most often - though not quite all the time. But I don\'t suppose it would matter if I pointed out that I don\'t have a problem makingphotographs of these subjects either with this technology, would it? ;-)
digitalbug30d wrote: chez wrote:
I see the boys who never have a banding issue still keep popping into this thread just to be heard again. Why is that? Surely Frued must have a term for this.
just like when one sees things that arnt there...LSD,Psychotic break....
;-)
digitalbug30d wrote:
you can keep using your camera as a lab test tool fine by me..
double ;-)
skibum5 wrote:
maybe your only experience is with studio and set shots, natural world photography, random on the spot photography, is a different game
That\'s where I shoot most often - though not quite all the time. But I don\'t suppose it would matter if I pointed out that I don\'t have a problem making photographs of these subjects either with this technology, would it? ;-)
digitalbug30d wrote: chez wrote:
I see the boys who never have a banding issue still keep popping into this thread just to be heard again. Why is that? Surely Frued must have a term for this.
just like when one sees things that arnt there...LSD,Psychotic break....
;-)
digitalbug30d wrote:
you can keep using your camera as a lab test tool fine by me..
double ;-)
skibum5 wrote:
maybe your only experience is with studio and set shots, natural world photography, random on the spot photography, is a different game
That\'s where I shoot most often - though not quite all the time. But I don\'t suppose it would matter if I pointed out that I don\'t have a problem with this technology making photographs of these subjects either, would it? ;-)
digitalbug30d wrote: chez wrote:
I see the boys who never have a banding issue still keep popping into this thread just to be heard again. Why is that? Surely Frued must have a term for this.
just like when one sees things that arnt there...LSD,Psychotic break....
;-)
digitalbug30d wrote:
you can keep using your camera as a lab test tool fine by me..
double ;-)
skibum5 wrote:
maybe your only experience is with studio and set shots, natural world photography, random on the spot photography, is a different game
That\'s where I shoot most often - though not quite all the time. But I don\'t suppose it would matter if I pointed out that I don\'t have a problem with this technology shooting these subjects either, would it? ;-)
digitalbug30d wrote: chez wrote:
I see the boys who never have a banding issue still keep popping into this thread just to be heard again. Why is that? Surely Frued must have a term for this.
just like when one sees things that arnt there...LSD,Psychotic break....
;-)
digitalbug30d wrote:
you can keep using your camera as a lab test tool fine by me..
double ;-)
skibum5 wrote:
maybe your only experience is with studio and set shots, natural world photography, random on the spot photography, is a different game
That\'s where I shoot most often - though not quite all the time. But I don\'t suppose it would matter if I pointed out that I don\'t have a problem with this technology shooting their either, would it? ;-)
digitalbug30d wrote: chez wrote:
I see the boys who never have a banding issue still keep popping into this thread just to be heard again. Why is that? Surely Frued must have a term for this.
just like when one sees things that arnt there...LSD,Psychotic break....
;-)
digitalbug30d wrote:
you can keep using your camera as a lab test tool fine by me..
digitalbug30d wrote: chez wrote:
I see the boys who never have a banding issue still keep popping into this thread just to be heard again. Why is that? Surely Frued must have a term for this.
just like when one sees things that arnt there...LSD,Psychotic break....
;-)
digitalbug30d wrote:
you can keep using your camera as a lab test tool fine by me..
digitalbug30d wrote: chez wrote:
I see the boys who never have a banding issue still keep popping into this thread just to be heard again. Why is that? Surely Frued must have a term for this.
just like when one sees things that arnt there...LSD,Psychotic break....
;-)