Okay ... but I still don\'t get what made you state that it wasn\'t alt, as the poster was clear as to which lens he used. (I\'m assuming you were referring to the Nikon 24-70) ... but when someone uses a Nikon 105/2.5 AIS or 28/2.8 AIS or 24/2.0 AIS, they get heralded as \"alt\" ... yet are still Nikon brand?
Conventionally, one would use a wider angle lens to get the AOV of a pano. Unconventionally, one uses a lens of a more narrow focal length, takes multiple images and stitches them together ... as an alternative (read as \"unconventional\") lens solution, regardless of brand. I don\'t see how that is violation of the rules of the forum ... at least not to the degree it requires a callout ... particularly in this thread.
Okay ... but I still don\'t get what made you state that it wasn\'t alt, as the poster was clear as to which lens he used. (I\'m assuming you were referring to the Nikon 24-70) ... but when someone uses a Nikon 105/2.5 AIS or 28/2.8 AIS or 24/2.0 AIS, they get heralded as \"alt\" ... yet are still Nikon brand?
Conventionally, one would use a wider angle lens to get the AOV of a pano. Unconventionally, one uses a lens of a more narrow focal length, takes multiple images and stitches them together ... as an alternative (read as \"unconventional\" lens solution, regardless of brand. I don\'t see how that is violation of the rules of the forum ... at least not to the degree it requires a callout ... particularly in this thread.
Okay ... but I still don\'t get what made you state that it wasn\'t alt (I\'m assuming you were referring to the Nikon 24-70) ... but when someone uses a Nikon 105/2.5 AIS or 28/2.8 AIS or 24/2.0 AIS, they get heralded as \"alt\" ... yet are still Nikon brand?
Conventionally, one would use a wider angle lens to get the AOV of a pano. Unconventionally, one uses a lens of a more narrow focal length, takes multiple images and stitches them together ... as an alternative (read as \"unconventional\" lens solution, regardless of brand. I don\'t see how that is violation of the rules of the forum ... at least not to the degree it requires a callout ... particularly in this thread.
Okay ... but I still don\'t get what made you state that it wasn\'t alt (I\'m assuming you were referring to the Nikon 24-70) ... but when someone uses a Nikon 105/2.5 AIS or 28/2.8 AIS or 24/2.0 AIS, they get heralded as \"alt\" ... yet are still Nikon brand?
Conventionally, one would use a wider angle lens to get the AOV of a pano. Unconventionally, one uses a lens of a more narrow focal length, takes multiple images and stitches them together ... as an alternative (read as \"unconventional\" lens solution, regardless of brand. I don\'t see how that is violation of the rules of the forum ... particularly in this thread.
Okay ... but I still don\'t get what made you state that it wasn\'t alt (I\'m assuming you were referring to the Nikon 24-70) ... but when I (or others) use a Nikon 105/2.5 AIS or 28/2.8 AIS or 20/2.8 AIS, they get heralded as \"alt\" ... yet are still Nikon brand?
Conventionally, one would use a wider angle lens to get the AOV of a pano. Unconventionally, one uses a lens of a more narrow focal length, takes multiple images and stitches them together ... as an alternative (read as \"unconventional\" lens solution, regardless of brand. I don\'t see how that is violation of the rules of the forum ... particularly in this thread.
Apr 11, 2012 at 08:13 AM
Previous versions of RustyBug's message #10531918 « Pano-mania »
