parsons wrote:
here is the f11 / 16 comparisons for resolution, the branches are both 100% very top left of frame, the other is a 50% as the pot wouldnt fit
f16 on the left in both versions. as you can see (hopefully) there is very little difference between the f stops
I see what looks like quite a large drop in contrast, along with some loss of fine detail, in the f16 photos (as expected for the aperture). However, judging whether this is a large or \"very little difference\" is somewhat a matter of personal taste and experience. Sites like 16-9 and many of the posters here, who have tried a lot of top-notch lenses, will often be picky about \"small\" differences that might not bother you at all. I\'m glad you\'re enjoying the lens, please continue having a good day!
Mar 19, 2012 at 04:26 PM
Previous versions of mpmendenhall's message #10455587 « comparison- zuiko 24 vs canon 24-105 @24. wow »
