fredmiranda.com
Forum
Presentation Boards
Nature & Wildlife
Landscape Photography
City, Street & Architecture
People Photography
Black & White Photography
Macro & Still Life
Sports Photography
Wedding Photography
Digital Art, Smartphone & Abstract
Trip Location Advice & Meet-ups
Gear Talk
Canon Forum
Nikon Forum
Sony Forum
Leica & Alternative Gear
Fuji Forum
Film Is Not Dead
Micro Four Thirds Forum
Latest Photography News
General Gear-talk
Pro Digital Corner
Lighting & Studio Techniques
Post-processing & Printing
Forum & Miscellaneous
Assignments
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Photo Critique
Buy & Sell
Photo Gear
Tech Tools
Tips for Safe Transactions
Guidelines & Rules
Join Today
What's New
Latest Posts
FM Gear Reviews
Assignment Winners
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Category Winners
Landscape Photography
Nature & Wildlife
People Photography
Register
Login
Forum
Buy & Sell
What's New
Register
Login
fredmiranda.com
Login
Previous versions of
afm901
's message
#10403469
« Last nail on the MF-coffin »
afm901
Offline
Upload & Sell
:
Off
Re: Last nail on the MF-coffin
brett maxwell wrote
:
nugeny wrote
:
just a twist: nothing stops Nikon/Canon fro making 36x36 instead of 36x24.. That would increase mp by 1/3 to 48MP?
Other than the fact their lenses wouldn\'t cover a 36x36 square?
Let\'s put our thinking caps on for a second before we type.
The lens projects what shape image? Yes, a circular image. If the circular image covers 36mm horizontally, what will it cover vertically?
Hint: 36mm
Scott
Mar 03, 2012 at 06:59 PM
Previous versions of
afm901
's message
#10403469
« Last nail on the MF-coffin »