Smiert Spionam wrote:
The Nikon 105/2.5 is excellent, but the Canon 100/2 FDn is, if possible, even better. Nice compact size (about the same as the 105/2.5), great handling, and the FD-NEX adapter is fairly slim.
Hmmm. Different strokes for different folks, I guess.
In the 90\'s, I banged my head against the wall with the contrast-less head shots at f/8 with the FD 100mm lens. The printer finally said to me, \"You ever considered it a lens problem?\"
Upon, buying a Nikon 105/2.5 AIS and then a Nikon body, problem solved. The Nikon 105/2.5 is excellent.
Sorry, I fundamentally disagree with this, even in an age of post processing.
Smiert Spionam wrote:
The Nikon 105/2.5 is excellent, but the Canon 100/2 FDn is, if possible, even better. Nice compact size (about the same as the 105/2.5), great handling, and the FD-NEX adapter is fairly slim.
Hmmm. Different strokes for different folks, I guess.
In the 90\'s, I banged my head against the wall with the contrast-less head shots at f/8 with the FD 100mm lens. The printer finally said to me, \"You ever considered it a lens problem?\"
Upon, buying a Nikon 105/2.5 AIS and then a Nikon body, problem solved. The Nikon 105/2.5 is excellent and the Canon 100 is not.
Sorry, I fundamentally disagree with this, even in an age of post processing.
Try a Minolta 100/2.5 for $100 bucks, instead.
Feb 19, 2012 at 11:05 PM
Previous versions of JimBuchanan's message #10361284 « Which telephoto lens for nex? »
