Lars Johnsson wrote:
To say that the review is useless or no good because he made grammar & spelling mistakes is just ridiculous.
Yeah I would say it\'s just about entirely useless.
It\'s a bit like DPR when they site the specs of a new camera and there are 3 or 4 specifications that you know (from the manufacturer and other reviewers) they got wrong. It casts doubt over the entire review! With DPR it\'s easy cuz I already KNOW they\'re tards! So they\'re only useful for some very general opinions and the pictures of the product - or to know something has been moved from rumor to something that will actually ship. That\'s it. They\'ve screwed themselves out of any credibility beyond that (repeatedly!).
Same goes for these guys! Testing and commenting on precision equipment requires a level of technical writing that doesn\'t allow for much if any error. If great errors exist then they just don\'t have what it takes and the whole article is trashed as a result. Unless you don\'t mind the propagation of misinformation all over the place and for the entire life of said article it just has to be that way. Thiose guys got some real basic information totally wrong just cuz they couldn\'t arsed to RTFM. Plus there were \"spelling and grammatical errors all over the place\". Whoops! Red Flag, they\'re totally out! I won\'t even go there to read what they have to say. They\'re tards!
Lars Johnsson wrote:
To say that the review is useless or no good because he made grammar & spelling mistakes is just ridiculous.
Yeah I would say it\'s just about entirely useless.
It\'s a bit like DPR when they site the specs of a new camera and there are 3 or 4 specifications that you know (from the manufacturer and other reviewers) they got wrong. It casts doubt over the entire review! With DPR it\'s easy cuz I already KNOW they\'re tards! So they\'re only useful for some very general opinions and the pictures of the product - or to know something has been moved from rumor to something that will actually ship. That\'s it. They\'ve screwed themselves out of any credibility beyond that (repeatedly!).
Same goes for these guys! Testing and commenting on precision equipment requires a level, of technical writing that doesn\'t allow for much if any error. If great errors exist then they just don\'t have what it takes and the whole article is trashed as a result. Unless you don\'t mind the propagation of misinformation all over the place for the entire life of the said article it just has to be that way. Thiose guys got some real basic information totally wrong just cuz they couldn\'t arsed to RTFM. Plus there were \"spelling and grammatical errors all over the place\". Whoops! Red Flag, they\'re totally out! I won\'t even go there to read what they have to say. They\'re tards!
Lars Johnsson wrote:
To say that the review is useless or no good because he made grammar & spelling mistakes is just ridiculous.
Yeah I would say it\'s just about entirely useless.
It\'s a bit like DPR when they site the specs of a new camera and there are 3 or 4 specifications that you know (from the manufacturer and other reviewers) they got wrong. It casts doubt over the entire review! With DPR it\'s easy cuz I already KNOW they\'re tards! So they\'re only useful for some very general opinions and the pictures of the product - or to know something has been moved from rumor to something that will actually ship. That\'s it. They\'ve screwed themselves out of any credibility IMHO.
Same goes for these guys! Testing and commenting on precision equipment requires a level, of technical writing that doesn\'t allow for much if any error. If great errors exist then they just don\'t have what it takes and the whole article is trashed as a result. Unless you don\'t mind the propagation of misinformation all over the place for the entire life of the said article it just has to be that way. Thiose guys got some real basic information totally wrong just cuz they couldn\'t arsed to RTFM. Plus there were \"spelling and grammatical errors all over the place\". Whoops! Red Flag, they\'re totally out! I won\'t even go there to read what they have to say. They\'re tards!
Feb 19, 2012 at 08:27 AM
Previous versions of Bifurcator's message #10359083 « New Olympus OM-D announced »
