jcolwell wrote:
As soon as you post an image, the debate is all about the image. There are many other layers of debate, but the seminal debate is about the image. After all, that\'s what we\'re doing here - making images, eh?
Wrong:
The \'artistic\' quality of those 2 images was zero to null -> hence there could have been no relevant discussion on the images themselves as final product/result, but rather a discussion around the characteristics of the \"tool\" (body) used to get those images and how different characteristics might have altered the final result
(I love to argue with you:cool
Now some decent / average shots done yesterday and today (I only got the body since yesterday )
135L f2 @ iso 800
24L II, f2.8 @ iso 100
24L II, f1.4 @ iso 200
Feb 16, 2012 at 08:40 PM
Previous versions of adrianb's message #10352502 « 1D mark II »
:cool
)
