carstenw wrote:
Are you referring to any specific hard law of physics, or just invoking the hard law of physics argument in a hand-wavy kind of way to \"support\" your argument?
I am referring to shot noise (also known as photon noise) which is a consequence of the packetization of electromagnetic energy into photons and thermal noise (aka dark current) which is hard to get rid of without carrying vats of liquid nitrogen around with you. There is also going to be read noise, but it\'s more amenable to technology.
carstenw wrote:
Are you referring to any specific hard law of physics, or just invoking the hard law of physics argument in a hand-wavy kind of way to \"support\" your argument?
I am referring to shot noise (also known as photon noise) which is a consequence of the packetization of electromagnetic energy into photons and thermal noise (aka dark current) which is hard to get rid of without carrying vats of liquid nitrogen around with you. Three is also going to be read noise, but it\'s more amenable to technology.
Feb 16, 2012 at 05:14 PM
Previous versions of KaaX's message #10351920 « New Olympus OM-D announced »
