Tony B wrote: atroester wrote: vuilang wrote:
135L, 85L doesnt have IS, yet they\'re very sharp or extremely sharp.. Sharper than my 70-200II (i dont have 135 but seen its sample) So, IS isnt that important, especially at short range.
But it is with the new Canon 24 and 28 primes?! You\'re missing the point -- Canon is putting IS on things we don\'t want/need it and not putting on lenses that would really help low-light zoom pics (2.8 isn\'t THAT great for low-light work, IS would be a big help) -- and still charging a boatload.
You\'re also completely forgetting video. IS really helps a video shot -- that\'s what my 24-105 is primarily for. A lot of video shooters were looking forward to a stabilized low-light zoom. Here\'s hoping the Tamron 24-70 VC will have good IQ...
As videos are invariably of moving subjects how does IS help unless IS II comes into it\'s own during the panning process. Maybe I\'m being a bit dense here especially as I do not use movie mode.
shake, shake, shake, tilts, turn, shake, dizzy, dizzy, dizzy, sick, vomit, i hate your movie
that is how
Feb 11, 2012 at 10:54 PM
Previous versions of skibum5's message #10336746 « Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II Pre-order »
