fredmiranda.com
Forum
Presentation Boards
Nature & Wildlife
Landscape Photography
City, Street & Architecture
People Photography
Black & White Photography
Macro & Still Life
Sports Photography
Wedding Photography
Digital Art, Smartphone & Abstract
Trip Location Advice & Meet-ups
Gear Talk
Canon Forum
Nikon Forum
Sony Forum
Leica & Alternative Gear
Fuji Forum
Film Is Not Dead
Micro Four Thirds Forum
Latest Photography News
General Gear-talk
Pro Digital Corner
Lighting & Studio Techniques
Post-processing & Printing
Forum & Miscellaneous
Assignments
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Photo Critique
Buy & Sell
Photo Gear
Tech Tools
Tips for Safe Transactions
Guidelines & Rules
Join Today
What's New
Latest Posts
FM Gear Reviews
Assignment Winners
Weekly Assignments
Monthly Assignments
Category Winners
Landscape Photography
Nature & Wildlife
People Photography
Register
Login
Forum
Buy & Sell
What's New
Register
Login
fredmiranda.com
Login
Previous versions of
mmurph
's message
#10332167
« Why did Canon ever produce the lack-luster 5D MKII? »
mmurph
Offline
Upload & Sell
:
On
Re: Why did Canon ever produce the lack-luster 5D MKII?
surf monkey wrote
:
Why did Canon ever produce the lack-luster 5D MKII?
Simple, it made them lots of money.
Yeah, Plus it was a TOTAL revolution in terms of video.
They have always surprised us in one way or another with the new generation.
Feb 10, 2012 at 02:14 PM
Previous versions of
mmurph
's message
#10332167
« Why did Canon ever produce the lack-luster 5D MKII? »